👨‍💼 CUSTOMER CARE NO +918468865271

⭐ TOP RATED SELLER ON AMAZON, FLIPKART, EBAY & WALMART

🏆 TRUSTED FOR 10+ YEARS

  • From India to the World — Discover Our Global Stores

🚚 Extra 10% + Free Shipping? Yes, Please!

Shop above ₹5000 and save 10% instantly—on us!

THANKYOU10

Kosambi: From imagination to reality

Regular price Rs.796.00
Tax included


Genuine Products Guarantee

We guarantee 100% genuine products, and if proven otherwise, we will compensate you with 10 times the product's cost.

Delivery and Shipping

Products are generally ready for dispatch within 1 day and typically reach you in 3 to 5 days.

Get 100% refund on non-delivery or defects

On Prepaid Orders

  • Type: Hindi
  • Pages: x + 406
  • ISBN: 9788173054341
  • Edition: 1st Edition
  • Publisher: Aryan Books International
  • Size: 15 cm x 22 cm
  • Product Year: 2012

Whatever Kosambi said with more authority, giving his own arguments and making many mistakes due to the flaws in his viewpoint, on subjects like feudalism, casteism, Aryanism, primitive communism, Brahmanism, Kosala and Magadha, development of agriculture in the Ganga valley, history and mythology, customs and beliefs, even interpretation of the past through models, the same things were repeated by later Marxists in a more crude form, expanding the mistakes and his own mistakes. If we have to evaluate him in one sentence, then it must be said that he is the first and the last Marxist historian of ancient Indian history and is a symbol of the limitations, strengths and deviations of Marxist thinking.

Kosambi seems to be very good at formulating theories. These theories have been given to him readymade. For example, 'It is more important to change history than to write it' is a variation of Marx's famous aphorism. If Kosambi really believed in this, he should have entered active politics instead of writing history. History cannot be changed, it can be understood and with that understanding, the future can be shaped. In the absence of this understanding or amidst middle class comforts, he kept using Marxist rhetoric and that too with a skewed understanding of Marxism.